![]() We haven't seen much in the way of M.2 NVMe SSDs from Seagate in the past few years, even as the market continues to produce faster and faster drives for increasingly lower prices. Here the drive redeemed its lower 4K scores with one of the highest game folder transfer speeds we've seen, which makes sense when you consider how heavily this drive is marketed toward the gaming set. Last up is a series of file and folder transfers from one location on the test drive to another done in the AS-SSD benchmarking utility. However, the gap here only really makes itself obvious in benchmarks, and isn't significant enough that most users would be able to notice the difference in daily use. It was also nearly 100MBps behind the Samsung SSD 970 EVO in 4K write speeds. That said, the drive then went on to post the highest sequential write speeds we've ever seen in our testing results: 3,172MBps (though that number was still ever-so-slightly less than Seagate's ratings).Ĭrystal DiskMark 4K results saw the drive taking a bit of step back in performance versus its competition, posting some of the lowest 4K read and write speeds in its price bracket, and even getting beat out by less expensive SSDs like the Editors' Choice ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro. Here the FireCuda 510 posted higher-than-average read speeds, though they were still roughly 300MBps less than Seagate's ratings. Next up, the Crystal Sequential tests simulate best-case, straight-line transfers of large files in contrast, the 4K (or "random read/write") tests simulate typical processes involved in program/game loads or boot-up sequences. Here the FireCuda 510 posted results right in line with the rest of the NVMe SSD pack, though it's rare that even the slowest SSDs will post anomalous scores in this test. In our benchmarking suite, first up is PCMark 8's Storage test, which simulates everyday disk accesses in tasks such as editing photos and web browsing. ![]() Seagate rates the FireCuda 510 for up to a max sequential read speed of 3,450MBps, and a write of 3,200MBps, though in our benchmarks we found the drive fell short on both those claims. Another perk for long-term users: The FireCuda 510 carries a warranty of five years. Even accounting for the current street price as of this writing ($330 for the 1TB), you should still expect to pay 33 cents per gigabyte for a drive with a durability rating that's 100TBW lower than the FireCuda 510. What's the catch? That drive carries an MSRP nearly double that of the FireCuda 510 (45 cents per gigabyte). Interestingly enough, the dc79 Elite PC's I have, do not have that issue with non-HP SATA III hard drives-even though their controllers are only SATA II as well.MSRP TBW Rating Cost Per Gigabyte Seagate FireCuda 510 (1TB)įor example, the Samsung SSD 970 Pro carries one of the highest durability ratings of any drive we've tested at 1,200TBW, and until the FireCuda 510 came along, was a leader in the space. You should be able to use the 3 TB drive as a data drive if you format it in GPT, provided the incompatibility issue does not exist when it is not being used as a boot drive. IMO, the drive not being recognized is because of that incompatibility issue outlined in the support document.įor more info regarding drives in excess of 2 TB, please read this HP white paper below. The 8200 Elite's 1 TB HDD worked perfectly fine in my dc7800, and the WD 500 GB disk worked perfectly fine in my 8200 Elite (which has a SATA III HDD controller). The 8200 Elite came from the factory with the 1 TB HDD. I swapped the 500 GB disk with a 1 TB SATA III disk that came from my 8200 Elite CMT. I assumed the drive was defective, so I RMA'd it, and the second one did the exact same thing. W7 did work for a while and then the drive wasn't recognized anymore. ![]() ![]() I had the same thing happen to me (the first issue listed in the document) on my dc7800 when I installed a new 500 GB WD Caviar Black HDD, SATA III HDD. If the HDD is a SATA III (6.0 GBPS) drive, there is an extremely good chance it has one of the symptoms listed in this HP document below. You cannot exceed 2 TB for a boot disk when your PC does not have a UEFI BIOS (which the dc7700 doesn't).Ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |